Wednesday, July 19, 2017

United Kingdom Doubles Down on Support for Tobacco Harm Reduction



The United Kingdom Department of Health’s new position statement (here), “Towards a Smokefree Generation,” is, as Clive Bates wrote (here), “probably the first significant government policy paper anywhere that recognises and pursues the opportunities of tobacco harm reduction, rather than defining these technologies as a threat to be suppressed.  For that, the Department of Health and its allies deserve considerable credit.”



Indeed.



British health authorities have been telling smokers the truth about vaping since 2011 (as I have noted here, here, here and here), and British smokers have listened – the UK’s vaping population has ballooned to 2.9 million (here), while smoking has significantly declined.  In fact, a Public Health England official recently reported (here) that the UK smoking rate is now the second lowest in the European Union, after SWEDEN!



Meanwhile, the U.S. persists in advocating for a “tobacco-free society” and a “tobacco endgame,” demonizing smoke-free products with untruths and giving continuing life to urban anti-vaping myths.  The UK paper underscores this stark contrast.



“Towards a Smokefree Generation” sets forth the facts about e-cigarettes’ relative safety:



“… the evidence is increasingly clear that e-cigarettes are significantly less harmful to health than smoking tobacco.”



The UK Department of Health promises to help smokers make the switch:



“The government will seek to support consumers in stopping smoking and adopting the use of

less harmful nicotine products. Public Health England has produced guidance for employers

and organisations looking to introduce policies around e-cigarettes and vaping in public and

recommend such policies to be evidence-based.”



The paper dismisses the unfounded claim that second-hand vapor is a health threat:



“Public Health England recommends that e-cigarette use is not covered by smokefree legislation and should not routinely be included in the requirements of an organisation’s smokefree policy.”



Additionally, the document invites the introduction of new tobacco harm reduction products, an apparent reference to products like Philip Morris International’s heat-not-burn iQOS:



“… there has been the development and very recent introduction of novel tobacco products that claim to reduce the harm of smoking. We welcome innovation that will reduce the harms caused by smoking and will evaluate whether products such as novel tobacco products have a role to play in reducing the risk of harm to smokers.”



Concluding, the UK pledges:



“Public Health England will continue to provide smokers and the public with clear, evidence based and accurate information on the relative harm of nicotine, e-cigarettes, other nicotine delivery systems and smoked tobacco, to enable informed decision-making.”



American health authorities, are you listening?





Wednesday, July 12, 2017

The Illogic of Condoning Vaping & Condemning Smokeless – Both Are Safer for Smokers



While many American tobacco researchers and policy experts have, of late, moved to endorse reasonable regulation of e-cigarettes and vaping, most persist in condemning smokeless tobacco products, which have been proven to be nearly harmless.  It is irrational to support one and prohibit the other, when both are legitimate harm reduction options for smokers.

The illogic of this dual position is displayed in the work of Dr. Dorothy Hatsukami, a prestigious tobacco researcher, author of 250 published articles (here) and recipient of tens of millions of dollars in NIH funding (available here, including $13 million to study reducing nicotine in cigarettes).  Dr. Hatsukami recently signed a letter to FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb (here) and published an article in Tobacco Control (here).

In the letter to the commissioner, Dr. Hatsukami applauded his “openness to the concept of tobacco harm reduction…There is already a considerable body of science and experience suggesting that a harm reduction approach…could yield substantial and highly cost-effective public health benefits…at this time we do not believe that the current regulatory framework for the low-risk nicotine products such as e-cigarettes and smokeless tobacco is appropriate or will deliver the substantial public health benefits we hope and expect FDA’s oversight will bring.”  The letter encouraged the FDA to regulate tobacco products according to risk and to “support informed choice through truthful communication of risk.”

However, in her Tobacco Control commentary, Dr. Hatsukami took a contrary view, fully endorsing the FDA’s proposed standard for NNN, which I have eviscerated here and here.  She wrote, “If [FDA] puts the proposed rule into effect, it would be a significant and important step towards minimising the harms from smokeless tobacco use.”  Surprisingly, she asserted that “the risk for oral cancer is considerably higher for smokeless tobacco users,” and cited a federal study documenting that American men who dip or chew tobacco have no mouth cancer risk (here).

Notably, other signatories to the Gottlieb letter are genuine tobacco harm reduction advocates who have endorsed the substitution of smoke-free tobacco by smokers.  They include Clive Bates of the UK and Canada’s David Sweanor, who filed a comment (here) labeling the NNN rule “reckless and pointless.”  American signatories who are on record about the relative safety of smokeless are Sally Satel (here and here), Kenneth Warner (here and here), David B. Abrams (here) and Raymond S. Niaura (here). 




Wednesday, July 5, 2017

Drinking, Bingeing and Toking More Popular Than Smoking Among Teens in 2014



Teen smoking deservedly gets a great deal of attention from the media and public policymakers, but one government survey shows that teens consume alcohol and marijuana at far higher rates than cigarettes.

The National Surveys on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), which I discussed last week (here), provide intriguing insights into use of licit and illicit products.

At left are 2014 NSDUH estimates of the numbers – and percentages by age – of Americans using cigarettes, smokeless tobacco, alcohol and marijuana in the past month. (Binge drinking is defined as consuming five or more drinks within two hours)  There were nearly 56 million smokers, 8.6 million smokeless tobacco users, 22.5 million marijuana users and a whopping 140 million drinkers.  There were actually more binge drinkers (61 million) than smokers. 

The following table shows the number of teens (12-17 years) and young adults (18-20 years) who used these substances in 2014.

Numbers (millions) of Teens and Young Adults Who Were Past-Month Smokers, Smokeless Users, Drinkers, Binge Drinkers and Marijuana Users in 2014





Teens (12-17 yrs)Young Adults (18-20 yrsTotal




Smokers1.233.244.47
Smokeless Users0.500.661.16
Drinkers2.805.888.68
Binge Drinkers1.533.745.27
Marijuana Users1.852.774.62

There were some 1.2 million past-month smokers under 18, and about half a million underage smokeless users.  These numbers pale in comparison to those for alcohol.  There were 2.8 million drinkers under 18, and another 5.9 million between 18 and 20.  There were more underage binge drinkers (1.5 million) and marijuana users (1.85 million) than smokers.  The totals for marijuana, drinking and binge drinking are all greater than smoking.

Teenage smoking must be prevented, but teen abuse of alcohol and marijuana also requires attention.